LIBE 467
Assignment
1: Evaluation of a Reference Work
Laura Fletcher
Introduction
This evaluation process is
based on the suggested considerations outlined in Reference skills for the school library media specialist:
Tools and tips (Riedling, Shake,
& Houston, 2013). In summary the evaluation criteria
to consider includes:
1.
Content Scope: "...basic breadth and
depth question of what is covered and in what details."
2. Accuracy,
Authority and Bias: "... education and experience of the
authors, editors, and contributors, as well as the reputation of the publisher
... Objectivity and fairness of a source."
3. Arrangement
and Presentation: "... a particular sequence such as
alphabetical, chronological, or classified...flexibility of the reference
sources... Physical makeup, binding, illustrations, and layout..."
4. Relation
to Similar Works: "...assessing the potential value of the new
resources to the collection. What will this resource add to the current
collection?"
5. Timeliness
and Permanence: "Printed resources are often considered to
be out of date before they reach the student. All sources should be checked for
currency." As well, be aware of the probable lifespan of a resource in
order to determine its value to the collection.
6. Cost:
"...determine if the price is appropriate in relation to the needs of the
students, as well as anticipated frequency and length of use."(Mueller,
2019)
In addition, based on General guidelines for replacing reference
materials (Riedling et al., p. 24), print encyclopedias, a synoptic source
type, and books in the subject area of science have approximately a five year
shelf life. Printed formats of encyclopedias “are useful for ready-reference,
factual-type questions…, to background information questions…, to pre-research
information (teaching systematic approaches to gathering information and
becoming aware of larger issues and related concepts)” (Riedling et al., p.
71). In assessing our school reference collection, the encyclopedias available
to students are currently dated and potential replacements would offer more
current information and formatting that better complements our students
learning needs.
Methodology
A rubric (Appendix A) was
designed base on the Brief Evaluation of
Encyclopedias (Riedling et al., p. 72), to evaluate the current set of
encyclopedias in the school library’s reference section as well as a potential
replacement resource. The majority of potential replacements were previewed
first-hand using a public library collection or chosen based on familiarity
with certain publishing companies.
Current resource in the library learning
commons reference section
Currently, the reference
section of our school library contains a set of encyclopedias from 1995.
Offering the New Grolier Student
Encyclopedia to students as a research tool to students in 2018 often
fails, and the books return to the shelves to gather dust. When introducing and
teaching students information literacy skills relevant and current reference
resources should be made available to better support diverse learners, and
engage students in the research process in a meaningful way.
Using the rubric to evaluate
this resource, it falls into the “weak” to “adequate” columns, primarily based
on being a twenty-three-year-old resource.
The formatting feels dated and images are not up to modern standards.
Content areas of specific concern are those regarding world cultures, science
and technology, and also a lack of contemporary issues.
Potential replacement resources
While some may argue that
the district’s licensing to the digital database World Book Online is sufficient, a well-rounded reference
collection consists of both print and electronic resources. Although the
electronic format offers elements of interaction, user-friendly content
searches, and access from a variety of locations among other strengths, a
barrier still exists in access to technological devices and reliable internet
access. Additionally, for some students, the accessibility of other websites
during research time poses as a tempting distraction; therefore quality print
resources are often a better format to ensure these students remain focused in
their work.
A full set of encyclopedias
that better complements our students’ reading abilities (evaluated as “strong”
using the rubric), would be the World
Book Discovery Encyclopedia 2017, which retails around $400-$500 (World
Book, 2019); however, this would also land us in a similar position five years
from now. At an even higher retail value, the World Book Encyclopedia 2019 (which although it says for ages 9-18
tends to be less accessible for our students’ reading levels) retails for
$900-$1100 (World Book, 2019). For that reason, a potential replacement
strategy could be to purchase a number of smaller subject area encyclopedias*
that each focus on specific areas of the curriculum (eg. science, animals,
countries, cultures). Doing this would also increase the number of students who
could use the resources at one time, since a student researching “gravity”
would not be contending with a student researching “giraffes”. It also provides
a variety of formatting and text-image ratios, which makes it easier to reach a
diverse reading population. This list includes books that would rank as
“adequate” to “strong” using the evaluation rubric.
Suggest titles include:
Curriculum
area – Indigenous studies
·
Indigenous Peoples Atlas of Canada (The Royal Canadian Geographical Society); $89.99
Amazon.ca
·
Indigenous Peoples Of Canada Gr 4-6 (Colin Turnbull); $15.99
Amazon.ca
Curriculum
area – Natural World – Animals, Insects, Arachnids, etc.
·
Kingfisher
Animal Encyclopedia (David Burnie); $34.70 Indigo
·
First
Animal Encyclopedia, Seas and Oceans (Anna Claybourne); $18.00
Indigo
·
Animals,
A Visual Encyclopedia - An Animal Planet Book (Cari Animal
Planet); $21.78 Indigo
·
National
Geographic Animal Encyclopedia (Lucy Spelman); $22.51
Indigo
·
Firefly Encyclopedia of Reptiles and
Amphibians (Chris Mattison);
$44.96 Indigo
·
The
Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs (Dougal Dixon); $15.99 Indigo
Curriculum
area – Natural World – Geography
·
The
Kingfisher Geography Encyclopedia (Clive Gifford); $39.99 Indigo
·
First
Encyclopedia – Weather (Make Believe); $3.99 Indigo
·
First
Encyclopedia – Earth (Make Believe); $3.99 Indigo
Curriculum
area – Outer Space/Discovery/ Science & Technology
·
First
Space Encyclopedia (DK); $21.99 Indigo
·
First
Encyclopedia of Space (Usborne, Paul Dowswell); $16.33 Indigo
·
How
Things Work Encyclopedia (DK); $18.02 Indigo
·
DK First
Science Encyclopedia (DK); $20.09 Indigo
·
Super
Earth Encyclopedia (John Woodward); $24.65 Indigo
·
The
Elements Books – A Visual Encyclopedia of the Periodic Table (Tom
Jackson); $21.08 Indigo
Curriculum
area – Human Body/Development
·
Children’s
Human Body Encyclopedia (Clare Hibbert); $17.75 Indigo
·
First
Human Body Encyclopedia (DK); $20.19 Indigo
·
First
Encyclopedia of the Human Body (Fiona Chandler); $15.97
Indigo
·
First
Encyclopedia – Body (Make Believe); $3.99 Indigo
Curriculum
area – World Studies/Humanities
·
People and Places: A Visual Encyclopedia (DK); $34.35 Amazon.ca
·
The Arts – A Visual Encyclopedia (DK); $23.10 Indigo
·
The World Encyclopedia of Musical Instruments (Max Wade-Matthews); $14.23 Indigo
·
Big Book of My World (Kali Stileman); $20.95 Indigo
·
The Travel Book – Mind-Blowing Stuff on Every
Country in the World (Lonely Planet);
$24.76 Amazon.ca
General
·
Smithsonian
The New Children’s Encyclopedia (DK); $34.74 Amazon.ca
·
Knowledge
Encyclopedia (Dorling DK); $27.43 Indigo
·
Smithsonian
Picturepedia (DK); $31.08 Indigo
·
Mathepedia:
for elementary students grades 3 – 8 (Popular Book Company);
$22.95 Indigo
Total approximate cost:
$742.58 for 31 titles
*Note:
this is not an exhaustive list, but rather beginning suggestions
Conclusion
When teaching students
information literacy skills, relevant and current reference resources should be
made available to better support diverse learners, and engage students in the
research process in a meaningful way. Therefore, after assessing our school
reference collection based on a rubric, the encyclopedias available to students
are currently dated and potential replacements would offer more current
information and formatting that better complements our students learning needs.
While some may argue that the district’s licensing to the digital database World Book Online is sufficient, a
well-rounded reference collection consists of both print and electronic
resources. If this prospective replacement is to be considered, then a small
committee of colleagues of classroom teachers could be assembled to further
test and evaluate the potential use of this resource.
References
Mueller, A. (2019). Lesson 3: Building a Reference
Collection for your School Library, course modules LIBE
467 63C: University of British Columbia Vancouver, online. Retrieved from Canvas learning platform.
Riedling, A. M., Shake, L., & Houston, C.
(2013) Reference skills for
the school library media specialist: Tools and tips
(3rd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Linworth.
World Book. (2019). World Book – Discovery Encyclopedia 2017. Retrieved from https://www.worldbook.com/Discovery-Encyclopedia.aspx
World Book. (2019). World Book Encyclopedia 2019. Retrieved from https://www.worldbook.com/world-book-encyclopedia-2019.aspx
Rubric to evaluate encyclopedias for student use as
library reference resources
Weak Resource
|
Adequate Resource
|
Strong Resource
|
Accuracy
·
Non-reputable publisher
·
Contributors/ authors unapparent
·
Lacks objectivity and obvious bias present
|
Accuracy
·
Generally reputable publisher
·
Contributors/ authors generally apparent
·
Objectivity and no obvious bias mostly present
|
Accuracy
·
Highly-recognized reputable publisher
·
Contributors/ authors apparent
·
Objectivity and no obvious bias present
|
Authority
·
Authors writing the articles or the publishers who
distribute it are non-reputable
·
Contributors are not prominent in that subject area
·
Publishing company is non-reputable
|
Authority
·
Scholars who write the articles or the publishers who
distribute it are generally reputable
·
Contributors are recognized in that subject area
·
Publishing company is generally reputable
|
Authority
·
Scholars who write the articles or the publishers who
distribute it are reputable
·
Contributors are prominent in that subject area
·
Publishing company is reputable
|
Currency
·
Information dated (<10 years)
|
Currency
·
Information mostly current (>5 and ≤10 years)
|
Currency
·
Information current (<5 to10 years)
|
Format
·
Illustrations are dated, not functional, indistinct,
difficult to follow, and inappropriate for the intended audience
·
Page layout is dysfunctional, unclear, and not suitable
for the audience
·
Organizational formatting is not user friendly
|
Format
·
Illustrations are mostly current, functional, clear,
easy to follow, and generally appropriate for the intended audience
·
Page layout is usually functional, clear, and suitable
for the audience
·
Organizational formatting is generally user friendly
|
Format
·
Illustrations are current, functional, clear, easy to
follow, and appropriate for the intended audience
·
Page layout is functional, clear, and suitable for the
audience
·
Organizational formatting is user friendly and supports
diverse learners
|
Indexing
·
Lacks detailed index for subjects and major subtopics
·
No image index
|
Indexing
·
Index for subjects, but major subtopics may not be present
·
Image index present or not
|
Indexing
·
Detailed index for subjects and major subtopics
·
Image index
|
Objectivity
·
Obvious or implicit biases excluded, emphasize, or
deemphasize particular beliefs or groups of people
·
Obvious biases towards sponsors
·
Advertisements obviously embedded in text or images
|
Objectivity
·
Some obvious or implicit biases that exclude,
emphasize, or deemphasize particular beliefs or groups of people
·
Some biases towards sponsors
·
Some advertisements embedded in text or images
|
Objectivity
·
No obvious or implicit biases that would excluded,
emphasize, or deemphasize particular beliefs or groups of people
·
No obvious biases towards sponsors
·
No advertisements implicitly embedded in text or images
|
Scope
·
Inappropriate for the age group it claims to serve
·
Subject coverage uneven from discipline to discipline
·
Contemporary issues excluded
|
Scope
·
Generally appropriate for the age group it claims to
serve
·
Subject coverage uneven from discipline to discipline
·
Some contemporary issues included
|
Scope
·
Appropriate for the age group it claims to serve
·
Subject coverage uniform from discipline to discipline
·
Contemporary issues included
|
Hi Laura, this is a well researched list of subject specific encylopedias. I like that you could replace them individually as they start to wear out or become outdated. I work at a 1:1 school so access to internet databases or encyclopedias is not an issue, for us the issue is cost because we are an independent school and have to subscribe individually rather than as a district. I wonder if your students had this level of access to technology would you think the World Book Online would be enough?
ReplyDeleteWhat a great question! I think, yes, if I had to subscribe individually rather than as a district I would select World Book Online as a database. Would it alone be enough? No, but if I could only get one, then yes, because it covers a range of subject areas and has a lot of features for various ages. Then I would make sure everyone knew how to access and use it to make it worth the money!
ReplyDelete